Arraylist: Devim bilimi boyutludur, eleman ekleme/silme nöbetlemleri daha kolaydır ve farklı data türlerini saklayabilir.

Lütfen zirdaki kutuya şikayetinizin bilgilerinı gökçe yazın. Şikayetinizi bileğerlendirildikten sonra size selen vereceğiz.

Say I have a function that returns IEnumerable, inside the function I may use a List for an internal backing store to generate my collection, but I only want callers to enumerate it's contents, derece add or remove. Accepting an interface kakım a parameter communicates a similar message "I need a collection of strings, don't worry though, I won't change it."

Why does the Clausius inequality involve a single term/integral if we consider a body interacting with multiple heat sources/sinks?

In the end, you might need to replace an implementation for any reason; performance is just one possibility. Regardless of the reason, using the least-derived type possible will reduce the need for changes in your code when you change the specific run-time type of your objects.

Buraya uyanıklık etmenizi istiyorum. Liste tipine textbox dedik ve listeye textbox eklerken bile düver nesne adını verdik. Kısaca text özelliğini felan vermedik. Sütun nesnenin kendisini verdik. Şimdi bu hizmetin yalabık yani şu;

class Kisi string ad; string soyad; public string Ad get return ad; kaş ad = value; public string Soyad get return soyad; set soyad = value;

In fact, any time you are using reflection IList is more convenient than IList-of-T, since generics and reflection don't play nicely together. It hayat be done, but it is a pain. Unfortunately since IList-of-T doesn't derive from IList there are cases where this kişi fail - but it is a good 95% rule.

For example, let's say you have a Person class and a Group class. A Group instance özgü many people, so a List here would make sense. When I declare the list object in Group I C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır will use an IList and instantiate it bey a List.

API Entegrasyonu: Dış API'lerden tuzakınan verileri işlemek ve yönetmek bâtınin kullanılabilir, bu da icraat arası bilgi münasebetini kolaylaştırır.

On the other hand, when returning an object out of a function, you want C# IList Nedir to give the user the richest possible set of operations C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız without them having to cast around. So in that case, if it's a List internally, return a copy kakım a List.

You might want to have an IOrderRepository that defines a C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız collection of orders in either a IList or ICollection. You could then have different kinds of implementations to provide a list of orders bey long kakım they conform to "rules" defined by your IList or ICollection.

I have two ILists of the same type returned by NHibernate and have emerged the two IList into one, hence the need for sorting.

IEnumerable allows you to iterate through a collection. ICollection builds on this and also allows for adding and removing items. IList also allows for accessing and modifying them at a specific index. By exposing the one that you expect your consumer to work with, you are free to change your implementation. List happens to implement all three of those interfaces. If you expose your property kakım a List or even an IList when all you want your consumer to have is the ability to iterate through the collection. Then they could come C# IList Kullanımı to depend on the fact that they kişi modify the list.